Calculate wing loading, aspect ratio, lift coefficients, and stall speed at bank angles. Includes aircraft reference table from paragliders to fighters.
Wing loading — the ratio of aircraft weight to wing area (W/S) — is the single most important number describing how an aircraft flies. It determines stall speed, turn performance, gust response, takeoff/landing distance, and ride quality. Low wing loading means slow flight, tight turns, and sensitivity to turbulence (paraglider: 5 kg/m²). High wing loading means fast flight, wide turns, and smooth ride in bumps (F-16: 430 kg/m²).
Stall speed scales as the square root of wing loading: Vs = √(2W/(ρSCLmax)). Double the wing loading and stall speed increases by 41%. This is why fighters need 200+ knot approach speeds while Cessnas land at 50 knots. In turns, the effective wing loading increases with load factor (1/cos bank angle), raising the stall speed — a critical factor in accident prevention.
Aspect ratio (b²/S) is the other key wing parameter. Higher aspect ratio reduces induced drag but increases structural weight. Gliders have AR = 20-40, airliners 7-10, and fighters 2-4. Together, wing loading and aspect ratio define an aircraft's aerodynamic personality. This calculator computes both, plus lift coefficients and the complete stall-speed-vs-bank-angle curve.
It gives a quick way to compare how different aircraft or RC models will behave without deriving the relationships manually. Wing loading and aspect ratio tell you a lot about stall speed, glide efficiency, maneuvering, and ride quality. That makes it easier to interpret the tradeoff between slow-flight behavior and high-speed performance.
Wing loading: W/S = Weight/Area (N/m²). Aspect ratio: AR = b²/S. Lift coefficient: CL = 2W/(ρV²S). Stall speed in turn: Vs_bank = Vs × √(1/cos φ).
Result: W/S = 673 Pa (69 kg/m²), AR = 7.43, CL_cruise = 0.35
Cessna 172 at 1111 kg: W/S = 1111×9.81/16.2 = 673 Pa (69 kg/m², 14 psf). AR = 10.97²/16.2 = 7.43. At 56 m/s cruise: CL = 2×10900/(1.225×56²×16.2) = 0.35.
Wing loading is simply weight divided by wing area, but it drives several important handling traits. Higher wing loading generally means higher stall speed, higher takeoff and landing speeds, and better ride quality in turbulence. Lower wing loading favors slower flight, shorter-field operation, and tighter low-speed maneuvering.
Aspect ratio adds another layer to the picture by describing wing slenderness. Long, narrow wings reduce induced drag and help efficiency in gliders and airliners, while short, broad wings trade that efficiency for compact structure, roll response, and high-speed strength. Looking at wing loading and aspect ratio together gives a much better feel for an aircraft than either number alone.
Bank angle raises the load factor because the wing must support both weight and the centripetal force needed to turn. That increases the effective wing loading and pushes stall speed upward. The turn-speed table is useful because it shows why even familiar aircraft can stall at much higher speeds during steep maneuvering.
Weight divided by wing area (W/S), typically in N/m², kg/m², or lb/ft². It describes how hard the wing works — higher loading means faster flight required to generate enough lift.
Stall speed = √(2×W/(ρ×S×CLmax)). Higher wing loading raises the minimum speed at which the wing can generate enough lift. This directly affects approach and landing speeds.
Wingspan squared divided by wing area: AR = b²/S. It measures wing slenderness. High AR (gliders) = low induced drag, efficient cruise. Low AR (fighters) = good roll rate, high-speed performance.
In a coordinated turn, lift must support both weight and centripetal force. Load factor = 1/cos(bank). Stall speed increases by √(load factor). At 60° bank, stall speed is 41% higher.
The maximum lift coefficient before stall. Clean wings: ~1.2-1.5. With flaps: 2.0-3.0+. CL max determines the minimum flying speed at any given wing loading.
Wing loading (W/S) doesn't change with altitude — it's a purely geometric/mass ratio. But true stall speed increases with altitude because air density decreases, requiring more speed for the same lift.