Compare supplier quotes on total landed cost including unit price, freight, duties, lead-time carrying cost, and quality adjustment. Pick the best quote.
When evaluating supplier quotes, the lowest unit price does not always mean the lowest total cost. A comprehensive quote comparison must account for freight and transportation, import duties and tariffs, the carrying cost of inventory tied to lead time (longer lead times require more safety stock), and quality adjustments based on each supplier's historical defect rates. Only by comparing total landed cost can you make an informed sourcing decision.
This is especially important when comparing domestic and international suppliers. An offshore supplier may quote a unit price 30% lower, but after freight, duties, lead-time inventory costs, and quality risk, the total landed cost difference may be only 5% — or the offshore option may actually cost more. Even among domestic suppliers, differences in freight costs, payment terms, and quality performance can make the second-lowest quote the best overall value.
This calculator helps procurement teams compare two supplier quotes on a total landed cost basis. Enter the details for each supplier and instantly see which option provides the lowest total cost of ownership.
Choosing a supplier on unit price alone is one of the most common and costly procurement mistakes. This calculator ensures you compare apples to apples by including all cost elements — freight, duties, inventory carrying costs, and quality — so you pick the supplier that truly costs less. Regular monitoring of this value helps teams detect deviations quickly and maintain the operational discipline needed for sustained manufacturing excellence and competitiveness.
Total Landed Cost = Unit Price + Freight + (Unit Price × Duty Rate) + Lead-Time Carrying Cost + Quality Adjustment Lead-Time Carrying Cost = Unit Price × (Lead Time Weeks ÷ 52) × Carrying Cost Rate Quality Adjustment = Unit Price × Defect Rate
Result: Supplier A: $16.72 vs Supplier B: $15.30 landed per unit
Supplier A: $15 + $1.50 freight + $0 duty + $0.14 carrying + $0.15 quality = $16.79. Supplier B: $11 + $3.00 freight + $0.83 duty + $0.42 carrying + $0.33 quality = $15.58. Supplier B is cheaper despite higher hidden costs, saving $1.21/unit.
A rigorous supplier comparison evaluates five cost dimensions: (1) Purchase price — the quoted unit cost. (2) Acquisition costs — freight, duties, brokerage, receiving. (3) Inventory costs — safety stock and pipeline inventory driven by lead time and variability. (4) Quality costs — incoming inspection, defect resolution, and process disruption from bad parts. (5) Management costs — the overhead of managing the supplier relationship.
Cost is critical but not the only factor. Many companies use weighted scoring that combines total landed cost (40-50% weight) with quality metrics (20-30%), delivery performance (15-20%), and strategic factors like innovation and risk (10-15%). This balanced approach prevents selecting the cheapest but least capable supplier.
Test your supplier comparison under different scenarios: demand increase of 30%, currency shift of 10%, tariff increase, shipping lane disruption, and quality deterioration. The supplier that looks best across multiple scenarios — not just the base case — is usually the most robust long-term choice.
Total landed cost is the complete cost of getting a purchased item from the supplier to your facility in usable condition. It includes the unit price, transportation, duties, inventory carrying costs driven by lead time, and quality-related costs from supplier defect rates.
Lead-time carrying cost represents the cost of capital tied up in pipeline inventory. Multiply the unit price by the lead time as a fraction of a year, then by your company's inventory carrying cost rate (typically 20-30% per year). Longer lead times mean more capital tied up in transit.
Quality adjustment accounts for the expected cost of defective parts from each supplier. If a supplier has a 3% defect rate, approximately 3% of parts will need sorting, rework, return, or scrap. The quality adjustment adds this expected cost to each unit purchased.
Not necessarily. Strategic factors matter: supply chain risk from single-sourcing, supplier financial stability, innovation capability, responsiveness, flexibility, and relationship quality. Sometimes paying slightly more for a reliable, responsive supplier is the better business decision.
For international suppliers, the quoted price is subject to exchange rate fluctuation. Model the comparison at current rates and at unfavorable rates (5-10% shift). If the offshore supplier is only cheaper at today's rates but not under adverse movement, the domestic option may be safer.
Annual re-quoting is standard for most components. For high-spend items or volatile commodity markets, quarterly or semi-annual re-quoting is appropriate. Always re-quote when market conditions change significantly or when current supplier performance declines.